The Effect of Environmental Costs and Profitability on Environmental Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/jmi.v4i2.214Keywords:
Environmental Costs, Environmental Performance, ProfitabilityAbstract
This research aims to analyze the influence of environmental costs and profitability on ecological performance at companies in Indonesia. This study is motivated by the phenomenon where many companies allocate ecological costs, but their effectiveness in improving environmental performance is still questionable. By using the method Weighted Least Squares (WLS) to overcome heteroscedasticity, this research tests the relationship between these variables using secondary data from company financial reports. The research results show that Environmental Cost does not have a significant effect on Environmental Performance, indicating that environmental spending is often used as a legitimation tool rather than as a real sustainability strategy. ROE has a significant negative effect on Environmental Performance, which shows that companies with high profitability focus more on achieving profits than on environmental investments. On the contrary, Firm Size has a significant positive effect on Environmental Performance, asserting that large companies are better able to implement environmental policies because they have more resources and face greater stakeholder pressure. This research provides implications for regulators to increase transparency in environmental spending as well as for investors in considering sustainability aspects in their investment decisions.
References
Amidjaya, P. G., & Widagdo, A. K. (2020). Sustainability reporting in Indonesian listed banks: Do corporate governance, ownership structure and digital banking matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-09-2018-0149
Barry, A., & Eccles, N. S. (2015). Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices: The case of King III in South Africa. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(4), 515–550. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-12-2013-1554
Chen, W., Xie, Y., & He, K. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance performance and corporate innovation novelty. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.01.003
De Villiers, C., & Marques, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure. Accounting and Business Research, 46(2), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1039476
Dienes, D., Sassen, R., & Fischer, J. (2016). What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), 154–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-08-2014-0050
Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
Farlinno, A., & Bernawati, Y. (2020). Effect of Financial Performance, Company Size, and Share Ownership on Environmental Performance in Mining Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Sustainable Business Accounting and Management Review, 2(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.61656/sbamr.v2i1.36
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (25th anniv). Cambridge University Press.
Gay, L. R., & Diehl, P. L. (1992). Research methods for business and management (1st ed.). Macmillan Publishing Company. https://www.worldcat.org/title/23869737
Hope, O. K., & Lu, H. (2020). Economic Consequences of Corporate Governance Disclosure: Evidence from the 2006 SEC regulation on related-party transactions. The Accounting Review, 95(4), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52608
Huang, X. B., & Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2015.03.001
Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The Relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.001
Ifada, L. M., & Saleh, N. M. (2022). Environmental performance and environmental disclosure relationship: the moderating effects of environmental cost disclosure in emerging Asian countries. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(6), 1553–1571. https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-09-2021-0233
Jadoon, I. A., Ali, A., Ayub, U., Tahir, M., & Mumtaz, R. (2021). The impact of sustainability reporting quality on the value relevance of corporate sustainability performance. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2138
Jain, P., & Malhotra, P. (2025). Does ESG impact corporate performance in environmentally sensitive and non-sensitive industries? A dynamic panel approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-12-2024-1087
Kalash, I. (2021). The impact of environmental performance on capital structure and firm performance: the case of Turkey. Society and Business Review, 16(2), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-11-2020-0138
Lee, K. H., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2012). Measuring corporate sustainability management: A data envelopment analysis approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.08.024
Li, Y., Zhao, X., & Yang, X. (2025). ESG performance and corporate environmental investment: Incentive or inhibition? Finance Research Letters, 75, 106814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.106814
Liu, Y. S., Zhou, X., Yang, J. H., Hoepner, A. G. F., & Kakabadse, N. (2023). Carbon emissions, carbon disclosure and organizational performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102846
Luo, G., Guo, J., Yang, F., & Wang, C. (2023). Environmental regulation, green innovation and high-quality development of enterprise: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 138112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138112
Ma, C., & Peng, D. (2025). Government subsidies, environmental costs, and green innovation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104237
Makpotche, M., Bouslah, K., & M’Zali, B. (2024). Long-run performance following corporate green bond issuance. Managerial Finance, 50(1), 140–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-12-2022-0588
Mennig, P., & Szigeti, Z. (2025). Synergies and trade-offs between environmental impacts and farm profitability: The case of pasture-based dairy production systems. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 21, 101798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101798
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Nguyen, T. T. D. (2020). An empirical study on the impact of sustainability reporting on firm value. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(3), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.03.07
Niu, B. (2024). Government environmental protection expenditure and national ESG performance: Global evidence. Innovation and Green Development, 3(2), 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100117
Panggabean, I. G. K., Lukna, Y. K., Balqis, P., Suganda, R. D., Sipayung, W. F., & Arnita, V. (2025). The Effect of Company Size, Profitability and Company Age on Environmental Performance with Environmental Costs as a Moderating Variable. Journal of Indonesian Management, 5, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.53697.v5i1.2200
Ratnaningrum, R., Rahmawati, R., Djuminah, D., & Widagdo, A. K. (2021). The value relevance of earnings in the presence of earnings management: Indonesia as evidence. Global Business Review, 09721509211060216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150921106021
Ratnaningrum, R., Rahmawati, R., Djuminah, D., & Widagdo, A. K. (2022). Value Relevance of Earnings and Book Value: Impact of Earnings Management and Family-Owned Firms. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 6(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v6i1.465
Ratnaningrum, Rahmawati, Djuminah, & Widagdo, A. K. (2019). The role of earnings management, family firms in the value relevance of earnings and book value of equity, before and after IFRS adoption. International Journal of Economics and Management, 13(2), 291–303. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB:gcd:7:27776583/detailv2?sid=ebsco:plink:scholar&id=ebsco:gcd:142807432%0A
Richardson, A. J. (1985). Symbolic and substantive legitimation in professional practice. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/3340349
Schiehll, E., & Kolahgar, S. (2021). Financial materiality in the informativeness of sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2657
Shi, Y., Li, H., Akida, A., Geng, J., & Shao, Y. (2025). Adaptability of environmental costs in agricultural systems: Evaluation of costs associated with nutrient management and comprehensive performance of different agricultural practices. Agricultural Systems, 228, 104388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104388
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Supatmi, S., Sutrisno, S., Saraswati, E., & Purnomosidhi, B. (2021). Abnormal related party transactions, political connection, and firm value: Evidence from indonesian firms. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(1), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3189.2021
Wong, W. . C., YewWong, C., & SakunBoon-itt. (2020). Environmental management systems, practices and outcomes: Differences in resource allocation between small and large firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, 107734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107734
Yıldız, T. D. (2025). Rehabilitation costs paid by mining enterprises in Turkey: Comparison of rehabilitation costs with their shares in mining operation costs and other environmental costs. Resources Policy, 104, 105593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105593
Zhang, H., Lai, J., & Jie, S. (2024). Quantity and quality: The impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on corporate green innovation. Journal of Environmental Management, 354, 120272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120272
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ratnaningrum , Dedi Hermawan, Bambang Widjanarko Susilo, Zahra Dinul Khaq

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

