Integrative Ethical Algorithmic Monitoring in Food Delivery: A Framework for Enhanced Managerial Decision-Making

Authors

  • Isabella Martinez Computer Science, USC, CA, USA
  • Ryan Tan Computer Science, USC, CA, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/jmi.v5i2.328

Keywords:

Algorithmic Management, Ethical AI, Food Delivery Platforms, Managerial Decision-Making, Simulation

Abstract

The rapid expansion of food delivery platforms, governed by opaque algorithmic systems, presents a critical managerial challenge: balancing relentless operational efficiency with fundamental ethical imperatives like fairness, transparency, and accountability. To address this, this study designs and evaluates a novel Integrative Ethical Algorithmic Monitoring (IEAM) framework aimed at enhancing the quality of managerial decision-making. Employing a rigorous design science research approach, our methodology integrates conceptual synthesis from algorithmic management and ethical AI literatures with scenario-based simulations. These simulations utilize structured dummy data modeling a mid-sized platform's operations 50,000 orders and 500 drivers across diverse zones to test the framework’s impact on key decision scenarios such as surge allocation and rating disputes. Key results demonstrate that the IEAM framework, which operationalizes ethics into dashboard metrics, significantly improves ethical outcomes. It reduced simulated order assignment disparity from 20% to 7% and increased the justified overturn rate for disputed algorithmic penalties by 40%. While marginal trade-offs in delivery time and processing costs were observed, the framework consistently shifted decisions toward greater equity. Its primary contribution is a validated, pragmatic tool that bridges abstract ethical AI principles with the daily realities of platform management. This enables more legitimate, sustainable, and data-driven governance, offering managers a proactive mechanism for responsible algorithmic oversight.

References

Acciarini, C., Brunetta, F., & Boccardelli, P. (2020). Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review. In Management Decision (Vol. 59, Issue 3, pp. 638–652). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2019-1006

Bates, S., Reeve, B., & Trevena, H. (2023). A narrative review of online food delivery in Australia: Challenges and opportunities for public health nutrition policy. In Public Health Nutrition (Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 262–272). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020000701

Benlian, A., Wiener, M., Cram, W. A., Krasnova, H., Maedche, A., Möhlmann, M., Recker, J., & Remus, U. (2022). Algorithmic Management: Bright and Dark Sides, Practical Implications, and Research Opportunities. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 64(6), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-022-00764-w

Bucher, E. L., Schou, P. K., & Waldkirch, M. (2021). Pacifying the algorithm – Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization, 28(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961531

Chen, L., Tong, T. W., Chen, L. ;, & Tong, T. W. ; (2022). Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a meta-organization research directions on a meta-organization Part of the E-Commerce Commons, and the Strategic Management Policy Commons Citation Citation. In Journal of Management (Vol. 48, Issue 1). https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research

Cui, T., Tan, B., & Shi, Y. (2024). Fostering humanistic algorithmic management: A process of enacting human-algorithm complementarity. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101838

Eberhard, K. (2023). The effects of visualization on judgment and decision-making: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 73(1), 167–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00235-8

Gudigantala, N., Madhavaram, S., & Bicen, P. (2023). An AI decision-making framework for business value maximization. AI Magazine, 44(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12076

Haggart, B., & Keller, C. I. (2021). Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance. Telecommunications Policy, 45(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102152

Hao, X., & Demir, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence in supply chain decision-making: an environmental, social, and governance triggering and technological inhibiting protocol. In Journal of Modelling in Management (Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 605–629). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-01-2023-0009

Huang, H. (2023). Algorithmic management in food-delivery platform economy in China. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12228

Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021). Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data and Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332

Kadolkar, I., Kepes, S., & Subramony, M. (2025). Algorithmic management in the gig economy: A systematic review and research integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 46(7), 1057–1080. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2831

Koshiyama, A., Kazim, E., Treleaven, P., Rai, P., Szpruch, L., Pavey, G., Ahamat, G., Leutner, F., Goebel, R., Knight, A., Adams, J., Hitrova, C., Barnett, J., Nachev, P., Barber, D., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Klemmer, K., Gregorovic, M., Khan, S., … Chatterjee, S. (2024). Towards algorithm auditing: managing legal, ethical and technological risks of AI, ML and associated algorithms. Royal Society Open Science, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230859

Leicht-Deobald, U., Busch, T., Schank, C., Weibel, A., Schafheitle, S., Wildhaber, I., & Kasper, G. (2022). The challenges of algorithm-based hr decision-making for personal integrity. In Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology (pp. 71–86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04204-w

Lu, Y., Yang, M. M., Zhu, J., & Wang, Y. (2024). Dark side of algorithmic management on platform worker behaviors: A mixed-method study. Human Resource Management, 63(3), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22211

Milkman, R., Elliott-Negri, L., Griesbach, K., & Reich, A. (2021). Gender, Class, and the Gig Economy: The Case of Platform-Based Food Delivery. Critical Sociology, 47(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520949631

Rezaei, M., Pironti, M., & Quaglia, R. (2024). AI in knowledge sharing, which ethical challenges are raised in decision-making processes for organisations? Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-2023

Rodgers, W., Murray, J. M., Stefanidis, A., Degbey, W. Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2023). An artificial intelligence algorithmic approach to ethical decision-making in human resource management processes. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100925

Seghezzi, A., & Mangiaracina, R. (2021). On-demand food delivery: investigating the economic performances. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 49(4), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-02-2020-0043

Stark, D., & Pais, I. (2020). Algorithmic management in the platform economy. Sociologica, 14(3), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/12221

Tsamados, A., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Roberts, H., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2022). The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions. AI and Society, 37(1), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01154-8

Uslu, S., Kaur, D., Rivera, S. J., Durresi, A., Babbar-Sebens, M., & Tilt, J. H. (2024). A Trustworthy and Responsible Decision-Making Framework for Resource Management in Food-Energy-Water Nexus: A Control-Theoretical Approach. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3660640

Weiskopf, R., & Hansen, H. K. (2023). Algorithmic governmentality and the space of ethics: Examples from ‘People Analytics.’ Human Relations, 76(3), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221075346

Zhang, A., Boltz, A., Wang, C. W., & Lee, M. K. (2022, April 29). Algorithmic Management Reimagined For Workers and By Workers: Centering Worker Well-Being in Gig Work. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501866

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31