Hybrid BiLSTM-Autoencoder Framework with Federated Learning for Intelligent Credit Card Fraud Detection

Authors

  • Nafeeza S. Arunai Engineering College, Tiruvannamalai, India
  • Shamataj S. Arunai Engineering College, Tiruvannamalai, India https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7975-6278
  • Hansika S. Arunai Engineering College, Tiruvannamalai, India
  • Karthikeyan S. Arunai Engineering College, Tiruvannamalai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/jmi.v5i1.330

Keywords:

Credit Card Fraud Detection, BiLSTM, Autoencoder, Federated Learning, Anomaly Detection

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital payment systems has significantly increased the complexity and volume of financial transactions, leading to more sophisticated credit card fraud patterns that are difficult to detect using conventional approaches. This study proposes a hybrid fraud detection framework that integrates Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), Autoencoder, and Federated Learning (FL) to enhance detection performance while preserving data privacy. The BiLSTM component captures temporal dependencies in transaction sequences by analyzing user behavior in both directions, enabling more accurate identification of irregular patterns. The autoencoder module functions as an unsupervised anomaly detector by learning representations of normal transactions and identifying deviations through reconstruction errors. To address data privacy constraints, the proposed model is deployed within a federated learning environment, allowing multiple institutions to collaboratively train a global model without sharing sensitive customer data. Experimental evaluation on benchmark datasets demonstrates that the proposed framework achieves superior performance over traditional machine learning and standalone deep learning models, particularly in precision, recall, and overall classification stability. The model effectively handles class imbalance and detects both known and previously unseen fraud patterns. Furthermore, the integration of federated learning enhances generalization by leveraging distributed data sources while maintaining strict confidentiality. This study contributes a scalable, privacy-preserving, and high-accuracy solution for real-world financial fraud detection, supporting secure collaboration across institutions and aligning with modern regulatory requirements.

References

Adepoju, O., Wosowei, J. B., Lawte, S., & Jaiman, H. (2019). Comparative Evaluation of Credit Card Fraud Detection Using ML Techniques. 2019 Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/gcat47503.2019.8978438

Aggarwal, C. C. (2015). Outlier Analysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14142-8

Alenzi, H. Z., & Aljehane, N. O. (2020). Fraud Detection in Credit Cards Using Logistic Regression. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(12), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0111265

Bhanusri, A., Ratna, S., & Shanthi, K. (2020). Credit Card Fraud Detection Using ML Algorithms. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 8(11), 45–52. https://www.questjournals.org/jrhss/papers/v8-i11/g08114552.pdf

Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Liu, B. (2020). Federated Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDM), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdmw51313.2020.00041

Géron, A. (2019). Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras and TensorFlow (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media. https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/hands-on-machine-learning/9781492032632

Graves, A., & Schmidhuber, J. (2005). Framewise Phoneme Classification with Bidirectional LSTM and Other Neural Network Architectures. Neural Networks, 18(5–6), 602–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2005.06.042

Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

Kiran, S., Varma, N. M., & Babu, R. L. (2018). Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Naïve Bayes and KNN. IJARIIE, 4(2), 112–118. http://ijariie.com/admin/main/abstract.aspx?id=8138

Li, K., & Li, X. (2022). Enhancing Financial Fraud Detection Using Federated Deep Learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 137, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.07.001

Liu, Y., Li, Z., Zhou, C., Jiang, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & He, X. (2022). Autoencoder-Based Anomaly Detection: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463865

Malekzadeh, P., Mohammadi, A., Plataniotis, K. N., & Wang, Z. (2021). Privacy-Preserving Anomaly Detection Using Federated Learning. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(3), 2079–2090. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2020.3013697

Mahesh, B. (2020). Machine Learning Algorithms – A Review. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 9(1), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.21275/art20203995

Meenakshi, F., & Singh, S. (2020). Comparison of Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes and KNN for Fraud Detection. International Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-020-00508-x

Mishra, A. (2021). Metrics to Evaluate Your Machine Learning Model’s Performance. Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/metrics-to-evaluate-your-machine-learning-models-performance-61172a392961

Oktavia, D. Z., Hidayat, D. A., Natalia, D., Prabantara, S. K., & Arfriandi, A. (2026). Machine Learning Performance Comparison for Web Application Security Threat Detection: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi, 5(1), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.51903/dhayjg79

Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010). A Survey on Transfer Learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10), 1345–1359. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2009.191

Phua, C., Lee, V., Smith, K., & Gayler, R. (2005). A Comprehensive Survey of Data Mining-Based Fraud Detection Research. Technical Report, Monash University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1009.6119

Rahman, M. H., Mian, M. S., Al-Hassan, A., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Federated Learning-Based Privacy-Preserving Credit Card Fraud Detection. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 35(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101565

Reddy, P. K., Rao, K. V., & Kumar, S. (2023). An Optimized Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Fraud Detection in Imbalanced Datasets. IEEE Access, 11, 50637–50649. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3278216

Roy, S., Alam, S. S., Alam, M. N., & Uddin, M. S. (2021). A Hybrid LSTM–Autoencoder Model for Credit Card Fraud Detection. IEEE Access, 9, 185827–185838. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3146445

Salazar, A., Safont, G., Rodriguez, A., & Vergara, L. (2012). Automatic Credit Card Fraud Detection Based on Nonlinear Signal Processing. In Proceedings of the 46th IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/ccst.2012.6393543

Santoso, J. T., & Raharjo, B. (2023). Innovation in Project Management Utilizing Machine Learning Technology. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 2(3), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v2i3.163.

Singh, N., & Kumar, M. (2022). Hybrid Deep Learning Approach Using LSTM Autoencoder for Anomaly Detection in Transactions. Expert Systems with Applications, 190, 116205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116205

Weston, D. J., Hand, D. J., Adams, N. M., Whitrow, C., & Juszczak, P. (2008). Plastic Card Fraud Detection Using Peer Group Analysis. Dalam Advances in Data Analysis, Corpus Linguistics and Intelligent Software Systems, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_14.

Wibisono, G., Nikhlis, N., Wicaksono, Y. A., & Faradila, S. (2025). Enhancing Decision Quality and Transparency via Machine Learning-Based Goodwill Impairment Estimation in Banks. Journal of Management and Informatics, 4(3), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.51903/jmi.v4i3.233

Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3298981

Zhao, J., Wang, L., Zhang, H., & Liu, S. (2024). Federated Deep Anomaly Detection for Financial Transactions Using Hybrid LSTM–Autoencoder Architecture. Pattern Recognition Letters, 176, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2023.11.012

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23